Secure.gov sites utilize HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// suggests you've securely linked to the.gov website. Share sensitive details just on authorities, secure sites.
- About - The Attorney General
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About About
Our Work
- Contact the Division Contact the Division
Report an Infraction
- Cases and Matters
- Press Room Press Room
Videos
Publications
- Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
Experienced Professionals
Attorney General ´ s Honors Program
Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
- Civil Rights FOIA Civil Liberty FOIA
Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
- En español
- About - title=" About" About
- The Chief law officer
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- title=" News" News
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
- Guidance Documents
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Employment
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices
- Find Help
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
2. Civil Liberty Division
3. The Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act
- X.
- LinkedIn.
The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., restricts discrimination by direct suppliers of housing, such as property owners and real estate business as well as other entities, such as towns, banks or other loan provider and homeowners insurance business whose prejudiced practices make housing unavailable to persons due to the fact that of:
race or color.
religious beliefs.
sex.
nationwide origin.
familial status, or.
special needs.
In cases including discrimination in mortgage loans or home enhancement loans, the Department might submit fit under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is evidence of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a rejection of rights to a group of persons raises a concern of public importance. Where force or risk of force is used to reject or hinder reasonable housing rights, the Department of Justice may set up criminal procedures. The Fair Housing Act likewise offers procedures for handling specific complaints of discrimination. Individuals who think that they have been victims of a prohibited housing practice, may submit a complaint with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or file their own claim in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings suits on behalf of people based upon recommendations from HUD.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
Among the main objectives of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to restrict race discrimination in sales and rentals of housing. Nevertheless, more than thirty years later, race discrimination in housing continues to be a problem. Most of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases involve claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing providers attempt to disguise their discrimination by offering incorrect details about accessibility of housing, either stating that absolutely nothing was readily available or guiding homeseekers to certain areas based on race. Individuals who get such false details or misdirection might have no knowledge that they have actually been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has actually brought numerous cases alleging this sort of discrimination based upon race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program looks for to uncover this sort of concealed discrimination and hold those responsible accountable. The majority of the mortgage financing cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have actually declared discrimination based on race or color. Some of the Department's cases have actually also alleged that towns and other local government entities broke the Fair Housing Act when they rejected licenses or zoning modifications for housing developments, or relegated them to primarily minority communities, since the potential locals were expected to be primarily African-Americans.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in housing based upon religion. This prohibition covers instances of obvious discrimination versus members of a particular faith also less direct actions, such as zoning ordinances designed to restrict using personal homes as a locations of worship. The number of cases filed considering that 1968 alleging spiritual discrimination is little in comparison to a few of the other restricted bases, such as race or national origin. The Act does include a restricted exception that allows non-commercial housing operated by a spiritual organization to reserve such housing to persons of the exact same religious beliefs.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Sexual Harassment
The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. In the last few years, the Department's focus in this location has been to challenge unwanted sexual advances in housing. Women, especially those who are poor, and with restricted housing choices, frequently have little recourse however to endure the embarrassment and degradation of sexual harassment or danger having their households and themselves eliminated from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is targeted at property owners who develop an untenable living environment by demanding sexual favors from renters or by producing a sexually hostile environment for them. In this manner we seek both to get relief for occupants who have actually been dealt with unfairly by a proprietor because of sex and likewise hinder other prospective abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without dealing with effects. In addition, pricing discrimination in mortgage lending may also negatively impact women, particularly minority females. This kind of discrimination is illegal under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination based upon nationwide origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the nation of an individual's birth or where his or her ancestors stem. Census data show that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing section of our country's population. The Justice Department has actually taken enforcement action versus municipal federal governments that have attempted to lower or restrict the variety of Hispanic families that may reside in their communities. We have sued lenders under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have actually imposed more strict underwriting requirements on mortgage or made loans on less favorable terms for Hispanic customers. The Department has likewise taken legal action against lending institutions for discrimination against Native Americans. Other areas of the country have actually experienced an increasing variety of nationwide origin groups within their populations. This consists of new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the previous Soviet Union, and other parts of Eastern Europe. We have done something about it versus personal property owners who have actually discriminated versus such people.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, forbids discrimination in housing versus families with kids under 18. In addition to forbiding a straight-out denial of housing to households with children, the Act also prevents housing service providers from imposing any special requirements or conditions on occupants with custody of children. For example, landlords might not locate households with children in any single part of a complex, put an unreasonable constraint on the overall number of individuals who may live in a house, or limit their access to leisure services supplied to other renters. In most circumstances, the amended Fair Housing Act prohibits a housing provider from declining to lease or offer to families with children. However, some centers may be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This kind of housing, which meets the standards stated in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, might run as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has released policies and extra guidance detailing these statutory requirements.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination on the basis of impairment in all types of housing transactions. The Act specifies individuals with an impairment to imply those people with mental or physical disabilities that significantly restrict one or more significant life activities. The term psychological or physical impairment may consist of conditions such as loss of sight, hearing problems, movement disability, HIV infection, psychological retardation, alcoholism, drug dependency, persistent fatigue, finding out impairment, head injury, and mental disorder. The term major life activity might include seeing, hearing, strolling, breathing, performing manual tasks, taking care of one's self, finding out, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act also secures individuals who have a record of such an impairment, or are considered as having such a problems. Current users of prohibited illegal drugs, persons convicted for unlawful manufacture or distribution of an illegal drug, sex offenders, and juvenile culprits are not considered disabled under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act pays for no securities to individuals with or without disabilities who present a direct hazard to the individuals or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether somebody postures such a direct risk must be made on an individualized basis, however, and can not be based on basic presumptions or speculation about the nature of an impairment. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's defenses for persons with disabilities has focused on two significant areas. One is insuring that zoning and other guidelines concerning land usage are not to hinder the residential choices of these individuals, including unnecessarily restricting communal, or gather together, property plans, such as group homes. The second area is insuring that recently built multifamily housing is constructed in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's ease of access requirements so that it is available to and functional by individuals with disabilities, and, in specific, those who utilize wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that forbid discrimination versus people with impairments, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is implemented by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Rights Division.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
Some people with impairments may cohabit in congregate living plans, often described as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act prohibits towns and other city government entities from making zoning or land use decisions or carrying out land usage policies that leave out or otherwise discriminate against individuals with specials needs. The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful--
- To use land use policies or actions that treat groups of persons with specials needs less favorably than groups of non-disabled individuals. An example would be an ordinance prohibiting housing for persons with specials needs or a particular kind of disability, such as psychological illness, from locating in a particular area, while enabling other groups of unassociated individuals to cohabit because area.
- To take action versus, or reject an authorization, for a home because of the disability of people who live or would live there. An example would be denying a building authorization for a home since it was planned to provide housing for persons with psychological retardation.
- To decline to make reasonable accommodations in land use and zoning policies and treatments where such accommodations may be necessary to afford persons or groups of persons with disabilities an equal chance to use and enjoy housing. What constitutes an affordable accommodation is a case-by-case decision. Not all requested modifications of rules or policies are sensible. If a requested adjustment enforces an unnecessary financial or administrative problem on a local federal government, or if an adjustment creates a basic change in a city government's land use and zoning plan, it is not a "reasonable" accommodation.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
The Fair Housing Act defines discrimination in housing against individuals with impairments to include a failure "to create and construct" particular new multi-family homes so that they are accessible to and usable by individuals with specials needs, and especially people who use wheelchairs. The Act needs all newly constructed multi-family residences of 4 or more units meant for first occupancy after March 13, 1991, to have certain features: an available entrance on an available path, accessible common and public use areas, doors adequately wide to accommodate wheelchairs, accessible paths into and through each residence, light switches, electrical outlets, and thermostats in available place, reinforcements in restroom walls to accommodate grab bar setups, and usable bathroom and kitchens configured so that a wheelchair can maneuver about the area.
Developers, home builders, owners, and architects accountable for the style or building of new multi-family housing might be held responsible under the Fair Housing Act if their structures fail to fulfill these design requirements. The Department of Justice has brought lots of enforcement actions against those who failed to do so. Most of the cases have actually been fixed by authorization decrees supplying a variety of kinds of relief, consisting of: retrofitting to bring unattainable functions into compliance where possible and where it is not-- options (financial funds or other building and construction requirements) that will offer making other housing systems accessible; training on the ease of access requirements for those included in the building and construction procedure; a mandate that all new housing projects abide by the availability requirements, and monetary relief for those injured by the infractions. In addition, the Department has actually looked for to promote availability through structure codes.
